Digital Portfolio Rubric
|
|
Excellent |
Above Average |
Good |
Fair |
Needs Improvement |
|
Portfolio Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
Readable - Is there enough contrast between the background color and the text color to make the portfolio easy to read? |
|
|
|
|
|
Professionalism - Is the appearance of the portfolio professional? Are the graphics, colors and portfolio language consistent with professional workplace expectations? |
|
|
|
|
|
Organization - Is the portfolio organized in a manner that makes it easy to follow and easy to quickly locate vital information? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Content and Function |
|
|
|
|
|
Links - Do all the portfolio links function properly? |
|
|
|
|
|
Content - Are there functional links to all essential portfolio content areas? Resume, Activities List, Letters of Reference, Skills and Abilities, Academic References (Transcript, Report Cards), Awards, Work Samples. |
|
|
|
|
|
Authenticity - Are the samples and illustrations a true reflection of the student’s efforts and abilities? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Presentation |
|
|
|
|
|
Speaking - Did the students speak clearly at a pace and volume so the audience could clearly understand what was being communicated? |
|
|
|
|
|
Eye Contact and Body Language- Did the student make appropriate eye contact with the audience and maintain appropriate body posture? |
|
|
|
|
|
Questions - Did the student appropriately and confidently address audience questions? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall Portfolio Impact |
|
|
|
|
|
Is this Portfolio an asset in demonstrating the student’s value (skills, abilities, knowledge) to a potential employer or college representative? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluator Signature |
Student Signature |
Date |